Comments on Puzzle #20152: Movie title #101?
By Tom King (sgusa)
peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: 
difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead?
peek at solution solve puzzle
quality: difficulty: solvability: moderate lookahead?
Puzzle Description Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers
#1: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Oct 22, 2012 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#2: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Oct 23, 2012 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#3: Kristen Vognild (kristen) on Oct 23, 2012 [SPOILER]
Comment Suppressed:Click below to view spoilers#4: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Oct 23, 2012
you must! oh...wait.#5: Tom King (sgusa) on Oct 23, 2012
CONGRATU.LATIONS, David!!! You are the GRAND PRIZE WINNER of ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!#6: Aldege Cholette (aldege) on Oct 23, 2012
Congrats David,good one Tom.:)#7: David Bouldin (dbouldin) on Oct 23, 2012
woo!#8: Ron Jacobson (shmily999) on Jun 13, 2017
Well done.#9: Andrew Schultz (blurglecruncheon) on Feb 17, 2020 [HINT]
Trying to do things 100% logically...#10: Bill (PopPop ) on Aug 6, 2023 [HINT]
Edge logic on the 8's. I had to place the 4 in the 1-4-1-1 in row 11, then the 3 in row 3. The 5 in column 13 was next--if it were in rows 3-5 then we'd have a 3 in column 14. Then a lot gets filled in, but we're still stuck.
I didn't know what to do after that. A lot of guesswork. I tried picking off corner dots with the 2's and eventually the image turned up. Can anyone do better?
I suppose we could just guess that the 2-2's formed an octagon with the 8's on the edges. I think the patterns are recognizable.
I got stuck trying to solve logically. After reading #9 I didn’t keep trying. Instead, after initial LL & EL, I “assumed” staircase logic. I don’t think that’s a proven logic and therefore counts as a guess. The rest solved with simple LL.
Show: Spoilers
You must register and log in to be able to participate in this discussion.